##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically review the evidence of intracranial pressure monitoring in neuro critical care unit in the context of a severe head injury. Study eligibility criteria: Patients were older than 12 years ,had a severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow coma scale < 8), that compared the use of ICP monitoring with control, that presented an estimate of mortality/disability prognosis 6 months after injury.only randomized clinical trials. Methods: Searched MEDLINE, the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed, HINARI,EMBASE; Cochrane Injuries group and the reference lists of articles. In accordance with the Cochrane handbook for meta-analysis and systematic review. Results: In the ICP and control groups there was no difference in the prognosis of disability (RR [Relative Risk]1.01, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.18). However, ICP monitoring reduced the duration of stay in ICU compared to other surveillance methods. The stay in the ICU with specific medical support for brain injury was also reduced compared to the control group. Conclusions: In patients with severe traumatic brain injury, the ICP monitoring was not difference to imaging and clinical examination. However, by keeping the ICP low there was a
substantial reduction in the requirement for hypertonic saline and a decrease in hyperventilation providing benefits to the patient in the ICU.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Intracranial Pressure, ICP monitoring, Traumatic Brain Injury, Head trauma, Brain injury, Neurocritical care, neurotrauma, prognosis, mortality

Section
Review Topics

How to Cite

A systematic review of intracranial pressure monitoring in adults with severe traumatic brain injury. (2019). Revista Chilena De Neurocirugía, 42(2), 160-167. https://doi.org/10.36593/rev.chil.neurocir.v42i2.118